Why Does Trump Say Iran Wants Talks as Nearly 600 Protesters Are Reported Dead?

0





 Rising Protests, Global Tensions, and a Narrow Diplomatic Window

WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump has said that Iran is seeking

 negotiations with Washington, even as a brutal government crackdown on

 nationwide protests has driven the reported death toll to at least 599 people,

 according to human rights groups. The unfolding crisis marks one of the most

 severe challenges to Iran’s ruling clerical establishment in decades and has sharply

 raised the risk of military confrontation in an already volatile Middle East.


Trump’s comments came amid mounting international alarm over Iran’s handling of

 the demonstrations, which began as protests over economic collapse but rapidly

 evolved into direct calls for regime change. With Iran’s currency in freefall,

 communications largely cut off, and security forces deploying lethal force, the

 situation has become a defining geopolitical flashpoint with global economic and

 security implications.



Trump Signals Willingness to Talk — While Warning of Force

Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, President Trump said Iran “wants to

 negotiate,” suggesting that private diplomatic messages sent to Washington

 diverge sharply from Tehran’s public rhetoric.


“I think they’re tired of being beat up by the United States,” Trump said. “Iran wants

 to negotiate.”


At the same time, Trump emphasized that diplomacy is not guaranteed to prevent

 military action. His administration is reportedly reviewing a wide range of options,

 including cyberattacks, expanded sanctions, and potential military strikes, should

 Iran’s leadership continue its violent suppression of protesters.


“If they retaliate, we will hit them at levels they’ve never been hit before,” Trump

 warned, underscoring the high stakes of the moment.



Death Toll Rises as Crackdown Intensifies

According to the U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA), at least

 599 people have been killed since protests erupted on December 28. Of those, 510

 were protesters and 89 were members of Iran’s security forces. The same group

 reports that more than 10,600 people have been arrested, a figure that continues

 to climb daily.


Iranian authorities have not released official casualty numbers, instead blaming

 the violence on what they describe as foreign-backed terrorists, particularly

 accusing the United States and Israel of orchestrating unrest.


Independent verification has been difficult due to a near-total internet blackout,

 although verified videos have surfaced showing rows of body bags at forensic

 centers in Tehran, fueling international outrage.



Iran’s Official Response: Control, Blame, and Conditional Diplomacy

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi insisted that the situation was “under total

 control,” telling foreign diplomats that the demonstrations had turned violent due

 to alleged foreign interference.


“That’s why the demonstrations turned bloody,” Araghchi said, claiming the unrest

 was designed to provoke U.S. intervention.


Despite the hardline tone, Araghchi acknowledged that channels of communication

 with Washington remain open, signaling Tehran’s interest in avoiding further

 escalation.


Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei echoed that stance, saying any

 talks must be based on “mutual interests” and not dictated by U.S. demands — a

 clear reference to Washington’s longstanding insistence that Iran curb its nuclear

 program and ballistic missile development.



Oman’s Quiet Role as a Diplomatic Bridge

Adding to speculation about renewed diplomacy, the foreign minister of Oman — a

 country that has historically served as a mediator between Iran and the U.S. —

 traveled to Tehran shortly before Trump’s remarks.


While no details were disclosed, Oman’s involvement has historically preceded

 major diplomatic breakthroughs, including early negotiations over Iran’s nuclear

 program. Analysts say this visit may indicate behind-the-scenes efforts to prevent

 the crisis from spiraling into open conflict.



Pro-Government Rallies and the Language of Fear

On Monday, Iranian state television broadcast images of massive pro-government

 demonstrations in Tehran and other cities. Crowds chanted “Death to America!”

 and “Death to Israel!” while officials framed the rallies as a national uprising

 against “American-Zionist terrorism.”


Iran’s attorney general warned that protesters could be charged as “enemies of

 God,” a capital offense under Iranian law. Text messages sent by police and

 intelligence services urged families to keep young people indoors, warning of a

 “firm decision” to deal decisively with demonstrators.


Witnesses in Tehran described a city gripped by fear, with streets empty after

 sunset and security forces patrolling neighborhoods aggressively.



Economic Collapse at the Heart of the Protests

The protests were triggered by the dramatic collapse of Iran’s currency, the rial,

 which now trades at more than 1.4 million to the U.S. dollar. Years of international

 sanctions, compounded by mismanagement and corruption, have devastated

 purchasing power and pushed millions into poverty.


What began as demonstrations over rising prices quickly transformed into a

 nationwide movement calling for the end of clerical rule, posing the most serious

 internal threat to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in nearly five decades.


Experts say the combination of economic desperation and political repression has

 created a volatile situation that security force violence may only intensify.



U.S. Tariffs Raise the Pressure

In a further escalation, President Trump announced that countries doing business

 with Iran would face a 25% tariff from the United States, effective immediately. The

 move targets major trading partners including China, Russia, Turkey, Brazil, and the

 United Arab Emirates.


The White House described the tariffs as part of a broader strategy to pressure

 Iran’s leadership while avoiding direct conflict. Trump has long favored economic

 leverage as a tool to force geopolitical concessions, and analysts say the measure

 could significantly impact Iran’s already strained economy.


Global oil markets reacted swiftly, with prices hitting seven-week highs amid fears

 that Iranian exports could be disrupted by political instability or U.S. military

 action.



Military Options Remain on the Table

Despite repeated references to diplomacy, Trump has made clear that military

 options are being actively considered. According to officials familiar with internal

 discussions, those options include targeted strikes, covert cyber operations, and

 expanded support for opposition groups.


The prospect of military action carries enormous risks. Many Iranian military

 installations are located near civilian areas, raising fears of mass casualties and

 regional escalation involving Israel, Hezbollah, and U.S. forces across the Middle

 East.


Iran’s parliamentary speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf warned Washington against

 “miscalculation,” stating that U.S. bases and Israeli territory would be “legitimate

 targets” if Iran is attacked.



A Regime Under Unprecedented Pressure

Iran’s leadership is still recovering from last year’s regional conflicts, including a

 brief but intense war in June during which Israeli and U.S. forces struck Iranian

 nuclear facilities and killed senior military commanders.


At the same time, Tehran’s influence has weakened significantly due to losses

 suffered by key allies such as Hezbollah. Analysts say Iran’s reduced regional clout

 limits its ability to retaliate without risking devastating consequences.


Former crown prince Reza Pahlavi, speaking from exile, has urged Trump to

 intervene sooner rather than later, positioning himself as a potential transitional

 leader should the regime fall — a prospect Iranian officials fiercely reject.



A Turning Point for Iran and the Region

With protests showing no sign of fading and international pressure mounting, Iran

 stands at a crossroads. The government faces a stark choice between escalation

 and engagement — between tightening repression or pursuing meaningful

 negotiations with Washington.


For the United States, the crisis presents a complex challenge: how to support

 human rights and regional stability without triggering a broader war. Trump’s dual

 message of diplomacy backed by force reflects that tension.


As the death toll rises and Iran’s streets remain restless, the coming days may

 determine whether this moment leads to historic negotiations or a dangerous

 escalation with global consequences.



Post a Comment

0Comments
Post a Comment (0)
To Top