New Cambodia–Thailand Clash: What’s Going On With the Other Wars Trump Claims to Have “Ended”?

0


 




Tensions in Southeast Asia have erupted once again as deadly border fighting

 between Cambodia and Thailand threatens to unravel a Trump-brokered peace

 deal signed only weeks ago. The renewed clashes raise sharp questions about the

 durability of Donald Trump’s diplomatic interventions, especially as he continues

 to claim that he has “stopped at least eight wars” since returning to the White

 House.


This new outbreak of fighting—featuring airstrikes, artillery duels, mass civilian

 displacement, and thousands fleeing their homes—highlights a broader pattern:

 several conflicts Trump claims to have resolved are still simmering or escalating.

 From Gaza to Rwanda–DRC to India–Pakistan, violence is flaring up despite official

 ceasefires.


So what is really happening on the Thailand–Cambodia border, and what does it

 reveal about Trump’s foreign-policy legacy?




A New Border War: The Collapse of the Thailand–Cambodia Ceasefire

The latest conflict erupted just months after Trump personally announced he had

 secured a “CEASEFIRE and PEACE” between the two Southeast Asian neighbors.


But on Monday, the fragile truce collapsed.


Casualties and displacement


At least 12 people killed so far


Tens of thousands displaced in Cambodia


Nearly 400,000 evacuated in Thailand


Fighting now spans six Thai border provinces


The renewed hostilities include airstrikes by the Royal Thai Air Force on Cambodian

 military installations. Thailand says these actions are retaliatory, claiming

 Cambodian artillery killed a Thai soldier and injured several others earlier the

 same day.


Cambodia denies this, accusing Thailand of spreading “false information” and

 engaging in provocations, including burning homes and forcing civilians to flee.


Why is the ceasefire collapsing?


The ceasefire—first agreed in July and expanded into a broader agreement in

 October during a ceremony attended by Trump—has been fragile from the start.


A month ago, Thailand suspended the agreement after a landmine explosion

 wounded one of its soldiers. Cambodian analysts argue that the peace deal was

 “forced” under the threat of Trump tariffs, making it less stable and less willingly

 embraced by both militaries.


Additionally:


ASEAN monitoring teams lack resources


Both governments are under pressure from rising nationalism


The Thai military, a powerful force in domestic politics, was reportedly unhappy

 with Trump’s heavy involvement


Border demarcation disputes trace back to colonial-era French maps, a source of

 tension for decades


The result: the ceasefire began unraveling almost immediately after being signed.




What Was the Kuala Lumpur Peace Agreement?

The Kuala Lumpur joint peace declaration, signed in late October, was meant to

 build on the July ceasefire. It was witnessed by Donald Trump and Malaysian Prime

 Minister Anwar Ibrahim, who served as co-mediators.


Main elements of the agreement


Military de-escalation


Removal of heavy weaponry


Clearing of landmines along the border


Joint supervision by ASEAN monitors


End to “information warfare”


Both sides agreed to halt online propaganda and cyber-operations escalating the

 conflict


Commitment to dialogue


Regular bilateral meetings


Direct military communication channels


Yet none of these measures have been effectively enforced. Only weeks later, the

 agreement is close to total collapse.




Which Wars Has Trump Claimed to Have Ended?

President Trump frequently highlights his role in brokering ceasefires, claiming

 credit for resolving or ending several major conflicts. According to his own

 statements, Trump says he has stopped:


Thai–Cambodia border clashes


Armenia–Azerbaijan conflict


Rwanda–DRC war


Israel–Iran fighting


Israel’s war on Gaza


India–Pakistan aerial conflict


Egypt–Ethiopia “war” (which analysts say never took place)


Serbia–Kosovo tensions


Some of these claims are disputed or incorrect, while others involve conflicts that

 are still very much active.


1. Rwanda – DR Congo conflict

Trump mediated a deal in June, but fighting never fully stopped.


DRC accused Rwanda of violating the deal this week


Armed groups remain active


Regional tension remains extremely high


2. Israel – Gaza war

Despite Trump citing a “multi-phase Gaza ceasefire” in October:


Israel has killed more than 400 Palestinians since the deal


Violations are ongoing


U.S. weapons continue to support Israeli operations


Trump’s pressure on Netanyahu is reportedly greater than Biden’s—but far from

 conclusive


3. Israel – Iran conflict

The June war lasted days and involved:


Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities


U.S. bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites ordered by Trump


Iran striking a major U.S. base in Qatar


A ceasefire was reached, but the situation remains extremely volatile.


4. India – Pakistan

In May:


Both sides launched airstrikes on each other’s military bases


Dozens of civilians were reportedly killed


Trump announced a ceasefire after four days


Pakistan credits Trump.


India denies he had any role.


5. Armenia – Azerbaijan

A U.S.-led peace deal was signed at the White House, but Trump later confused

 Azerbaijan with Albania during a TV interview, raising doubts about how deeply he

 understands these conflicts.


6. Serbia – Kosovo

While relations remain tense, no large-scale war has resumed.

This is one of the few conflicts where Trump’s mediation may have had a lasting

 effect.


7. Egypt – Ethiopia

Trump claims he ended a “war” between the two nations, but experts note no such

 war ever existed, only tensions over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD).




Why Trump’s Ceasefire Deals Keep Falling Apart

Several patterns are emerging:


1. Forced, rushed, or pressured agreements

Many countries reportedly felt pressured into accepting deals due to:


Threats of U.S. sanctions


Trade tariffs


Loss of military support


This leads to agreements that lack genuine buy-in and collapse quickly.


2. Lack of enforcement

Most ceasefires lack:


Independent monitoring


Funding


Long-term diplomatic engagement


Without these, parties quickly return to fighting.


3. Trump’s personal, leader-to-leader diplomacy

Trump often prefers:


Direct calls with leaders


Social-media announcements


High-profile ceremonies


But this leaves weak institutional frameworks, meaning the agreements don't

 survive beyond the headlines.


4. Misunderstandings and misstatements

Confusion—like Trump’s mixing up Azerbaijan and Albania—creates uncertainty

 about the seriousness and depth of his involvement.




The New Thailand–Cambodia Fighting: A Test of Trump’s Foreign Policy Narrative

This is the second time in one year that deadly violence erupted despite Trump

 claiming to have ended the conflict.


What triggered the new fighting?


According to Thailand:


Cambodia fired artillery at a Thai military base (Anupong Base)


A Thai soldier died


The RTAF launched “proportionate retaliation” against Cambodian positions


According to Cambodia:


Thailand initiated the attack


Cambodia “did not retaliate at all”


Thailand burned homes and forced civilians to flee


Both sides accuse the other of provocations.


Humanitarian impact


Cambodia reports four civilians killed


Dozens injured


Tens of thousands displaced


Thailand has evacuated 400,000 civilians


Fighting now spans nearly the entire border


International reaction


UN Secretary-General António Guterres urged de-escalation


Malaysia expressed “deep concern”


The U.S. said Trump expects both sides to honor the ceasefire


But neither side seems ready to back down.




Why This Conflict Matters

This crisis matters not only because of the human cost, but also because it raises

 doubts about the credibility of Trump’s global peace initiatives.


If several of the conflicts he claims to have ended are still ongoing or reigniting, it

 challenges the core narrative of his foreign-policy achievements.


The Cambodia–Thailand fighting is especially significant because:


It directly contradicts Trump’s declaration of victory


It occurs just months after the signing ceremony he attended


It involves two key U.S. partners in Southeast Asia


It threatens regional stability in the heart of ASEAN


A prolonged war could:


Disrupt trade routes


Trigger refugee flows


Draw in China and other regional powers


Destabilize Southeast Asia’s security landscape



A Region on Edge, and a Diplomatic Legacy Under Scrutiny

The renewed war between Cambodia and Thailand—despite multiple Trump-

backed agreements—highlights the fragility of ceasefires without enforcement,

 diplomacy without institutions, and peace deals shaped by political showmanship

 rather than a long-term strategy.


As fighting spreads along the border, and as other Trump-brokered conflicts

 continue to flare up, the question becomes unavoidable:


How many of the wars Trump claims to have ended are actually over?


For now, the answer seems increasingly clear:

Not many.


Post a Comment

0Comments
Post a Comment (0)
To Top