A Crisis Hidden in Plain Sight
Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) have become a dominant part of modern diets. From
breakfast cereals and protein bars to fizzy drinks and fast-food meals, these
industrially formulated products are replacing traditional meals across the globe.
But a groundbreaking series of scientific papers published in The Lancet has
issued a stark warning: ultra-processed food is linked to harm in every major
human organ system, representing a seismic and urgent threat to global health.
According to the world’s largest scientific review on the subject, consumption of
UPFs is associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, depression, cancer,
and even early death. The findings highlight the urgent need for structural,
political, and economic reforms to counter the growing dominance of UPFs in
global food systems.
What Exactly Are Ultra-Processed Foods (UPFs)?
UPFs fall under Group 4 of the NOVA classification, a system created by Professor
Carlos Monteiro and his colleagues at the University of São Paulo.
While minimally processed foods include fruits, vegetables, grains, and fresh meats,
ultra-processed foods are industrial formulations rich in additives such as:
Artificial flavors
Emulsifiers
Colorants
Preservatives
Sweeteners
Modified starches
These products are designed for long shelf life, intense flavor, convenience, and
maximum profitability, but often come with low nutritional value, high calories,
and chemical additives that are rarely seen in home cooking.
Common examples include:
Soft drinks
Packaged snacks
Breakfast cereals
Ready meals
Instant noodles
Processed meats
Protein bars
A Global Shift Toward UPF-Dominant Diets
One of the most alarming trends revealed in the review is the rapid displacement of
fresh foods by UPFs.
Key global statistics:
In the United Kingdom and United States, over 50% of the average diet is made up
of UPFs.
Among younger, poorer, and marginalized communities, UPFs may account for up
to 80% of total calorie intake.
In contrast, countries like Italy, Cyprus, Greece, Portugal, and much of Asia have
kept UPF consumption below 25%.
The shift is being driven by aggressive corporate marketing, strategic product
placement, and affordability, making UPFs the default choice for millions.
The Lancet Review: The Largest Scientific
Analysis Ever Conducted
A team of 43 scientists and global experts conducted a series of analyses and
systematic reviews, summarizing data from 104 long-term studies.
Findings:
92 out of 104 studies reported higher risks of chronic diseases or early death linked
to UPFs.
UPFs were connected to:
Obesity
Type 2 diabetes
Heart disease
Cancer
Depression
Stroke
Gastrointestinal disorders
Cognitive decline
Liver disease
Kidney problems
The studies show consistent associations across countries, ages, and
socioeconomic groups, prompting experts to describe the threat as "global,
pervasive, and escalating."
Professor Carlos Monteiro explains:
“Ultra-processed foods harm every major organ system in the human body.
Humans are not biologically adapted to consume them.”
How UPFs Harm the Body: Organ by Organ
1. The Brain
UPFs have been linked to:
Depression
Anxiety
Cognitive decline
Mood instability
Artificial additives, poor nutrient density, and excess sugar can disrupt
neurotransmitter balance and impair mental health.
2. The Heart
UPFs increase:
Hypertension
Cholesterol imbalance
Inflammation
Risk of cardiovascular disease
High salt, sugar, and unhealthy fats combine to create long-term heart damage.
3. The Gut
UPFs contain ingredients not found in home-cooked meals, such as emulsifiers and
stabilizers. These additives may:
Damage the gut lining
Reduce microbiome diversity
Increase inflammation
Trigger digestive disorders
4. The Liver
With high sugar content — especially from high-fructose corn syrup — UPFs
contribute to:
Fatty liver disease
Insulin resistance
Metabolic syndrome
5. The Kidneys
Salt-heavy UPFs raise risks of:
Kidney disease
Kidney stones
Fluid imbalance
6. The Immune System
Chronic exposure to UPF additives and low-nutrient density foods weakens
immune response, making the body more prone to illness.
7. The Endocrine System
Artificial sweeteners, preservatives, and packaging chemicals interfere with
hormones, increasing risks of:
Obesity
Diabetes
Thyroid disorders
Corporate Power: The Driver Behind the UPF
Explosion
The Lancet authors argue that the rise of UPFs is not a failure of individual
responsibility, but a result of massive corporate influence over global food
systems.
Corporate tactics include:
Aggressive advertising (especially to children)
Funding biased scientific studies
Lobbying against regulation
Influencing government food policies
Creating addictive, hyper-palatable foods
Flooding supermarkets with cheap UPFs
These strategies mirror the tactics once used by the tobacco industry.
One quote from the review states:
“The main barrier to protecting health is industry’s corporate political activities,
coordinated transnationally to block regulation.”
Why Traditional Policies Have Failed
Most government efforts focus on:
Sugar reduction
Salt reduction
Calorie labeling
Voluntary industry partnerships
But experts argue these approaches do not address the root of the problem — the
ultra-processing itself.
As Prof. Chris Van Tulleken explains:
“Reformulation is not the solution. The entire diet is being ultra-processed, and its
purpose is profit, not health.”
Even after decades of “healthier” reformulations — low-fat, low-sugar, keto-
friendly, high-protein, gluten-free — global obesity and chronic disease rates
continue to rise.
Policy Solutions Proposed by Experts
The Lancet series calls for strong, structural interventions, including:
1. Front-of-package warning labels
Including markers of ultra-processing, not just sugar or fat content.
2. Banning UPFs in schools and hospitals
Brazil is already implementing this change.
3. Regulating marketing to children
Especially for sugary cereals, snacks, and drinks.
4. Limiting shelf space for UPFs
To prioritize fresh and minimally processed foods.
5. Taxing or restricting harmful additives
Such as artificial sweeteners and emulsifiers.
6. Supporting traditional and local food systems
Through subsidies, education, and cultural preservation.
Scientific Debate: Associations vs. Causation
While the evidence is overwhelmingly consistent, some scientists urge caution.
Concerns include:
Lack of long-term randomized trials
Variability within the UPF category
Differing impacts based on lifestyle
Professor Jules Griffin emphasizes:
“Association may not mean causation, and more high-quality research is needed.”
Still, experts argue that the strength of current evidence is more than enough to
justify immediate public health action.
Is the Rise of UPFs Inevitable? Experts Say No
Despite corporate power, experts remain optimistic.
UPF consumption is still relatively low in many Mediterranean and Asian countries,
showing that cultural food traditions can maintain dietary strength.
The experts argue that policy change, not consumer willpower, is the solution.
As the review states:
“The continuing rise of UPFs is not inevitable.”
A Global Turning Point for Food and Health
Ultra-processed foods have reshaped global diets in just a few decades — and
scientists now warn that they may be reshaping human health at every level as
well. The evidence linking UPFs to harm across major organs is strong, consistent,
and alarming.
While more research is needed, the time for action is now. Governments, health
organizations, and communities must work together to rebuild food systems that
prioritize whole, minimally processed foods.
The message from global experts is clear:
Ultra-processed foods are not just unhealthy — they are a growing global threat.
%20(1).png)
.png)
